<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New AntiDebugging Timer Techniques</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/</link>
	<description>http://SecurityXploded.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:08:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-33984</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/#comment-33984</guid>
		<description>i think this is very interesting. Though I haven&#039;t have the full understanding of this I find this page very useful..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this is very interesting. Though I haven&#8217;t have the full understanding of this I find this page very useful..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inflatable Kayak Reviews</title>
		<link>http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-27459</link>
		<dc:creator>Inflatable Kayak Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 23:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/#comment-27459</guid>
		<description>what if i use the QueryPerformanceCounter function and have a value of one as the returned value and not zero?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what if i use the QueryPerformanceCounter function and have a value of one as the returned value and not zero?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinah CHua</title>
		<link>http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-26952</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinah CHua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/#comment-26952</guid>
		<description>I am inspired with your post to do more and to study more about I.T..so that i could understand you easily..you are inspiration to me..and to other person who are like me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am inspired with your post to do more and to study more about I.T..so that i could understand you easily..you are inspiration to me..and to other person who are like me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longpoke</title>
		<link>http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-5122</link>
		<dc:creator>Longpoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/#comment-5122</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t you just use the RDTSC opcode? Most people will monitor any API called during debugging. QueryPerformanceXX() are well known AFAIK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t you just use the RDTSC opcode? Most people will monitor any API called during debugging. QueryPerformanceXX() are well known AFAIK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: revolta</title>
		<link>http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-1342</link>
		<dc:creator>revolta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/#comment-1342</guid>
		<description>Could someone make entire executable form this code? I cant program c, so its difficult to me make this sample code run...

thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone make entire executable form this code? I cant program c, so its difficult to me make this sample code run&#8230;</p>
<p>thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wynney</title>
		<link>http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/comment-page-1/#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator>wynney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/#comment-1089</guid>
		<description>NORMAL_COUNTER_VALUE?

what?

Sorry, I&#039;m chinese...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NORMAL_COUNTER_VALUE?</p>
<p>what?</p>
<p>Sorry, I&#8217;m chinese&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

