Comments on: New AntiDebugging Timer Techniques http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/ http://SecurityXploded.com Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:45:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Longpoke http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/#comment-5122 Longpoke Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:34:52 +0000 http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/#comment-5122 Couldn't you just use the RDTSC opcode? Most people will monitor any API called during debugging. QueryPerformanceXX() are well known AFAIK. Couldn’t you just use the RDTSC opcode? Most people will monitor any API called during debugging. QueryPerformanceXX() are well known AFAIK.

]]> By: revolta http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/#comment-1342 revolta Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:22:17 +0000 http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/#comment-1342 Could someone make entire executable form this code? I cant program c, so its difficult to me make this sample code run... thx Could someone make entire executable form this code? I cant program c, so its difficult to me make this sample code run…

thx

]]> By: wynney http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/#comment-1089 wynney Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:52:09 +0000 http://nagareshwar.securityxploded.com/2007/12/16/new-antidebugging-timer-techniques/#comment-1089 NORMAL_COUNTER_VALUE? what? Sorry, I'm chinese... NORMAL_COUNTER_VALUE?

what?

Sorry, I’m chinese…

]]>